The strategic impact of the Panther tank vs Tiger tank and the Tiger vs Panther tank is a topic of extensive debate. The Tiger I was a psychological weapon, especially if driven by Panzer Aces of World War 2, instilling fear in Allied tank crews. However, its high cost and maintenance requirements limited its overall impact.
It can be found here, The Tiger Family Part I. Tiger II stemmed from Hitler’s desire to mount a longer barrelled, and therefore more powerful, 88mm gun in a tank. Tiger I’s gun barrel was 56 calibres long (56 x 88mm, or 4.93m), whereas the new gun would be 71 calibres long (6.25m) and need more internal space, making it too big for the
The kingtiger had a monstrous 125mm cannon, compared with only 90mm for the M36. The chassis and crew organization of the tiger tanks provided them with a high degree of initiative which was crucial in tank battles. The M36 also had weaker armor than the kingtiger, although it fared better on fuel. A better comparison with the kingtiger would
You love unfair matches, so today is the day of the year to show you something fun you actually requested, T-72 vs Tiger 2. For this scenario, we maximized T
The Jagdtiger ("Hunting Tiger") served as the most powerful armored vehicle of World War 2 and was a further development of the fabled "King Tiger" (Tiger II) chassis (also known as the "Konigstiger"). She sported a lethal main gun and was clad in heavy armor protection but suffered from excess weight and production issues leading to a slow and
. 218 226 486 53 117 211 434 220
is 2 tank vs king tiger
